Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 429 U.S. 190 - Craig v. Boren

Craig v. Boren’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4,124
cited by 4,124 later decisions
243
cited 243 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

1,086 federal appellate · 361 district · 1,130 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4,124 later decisions (243 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Batson v. Kentucky (1986), City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center (1985)

1,086 federal appellate · 361 district · 1,130 state decisions — followed in 48 states

1.6k0197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Younger v. Harris · Baker v. Carr · Stanley v. Illinois · Singleton v. Wulff

Cited together with Warth v. Seldin · Singleton v. Wulff · Reed v. Reed · Frontiero v. Richardson · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4,124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “classifications by gender must serve important governmental objectives and must be substantially related to achievement of those objectives.”
    63 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “vendors and those in like positions have been uniformly permitted to resist efforts at restricting their operations by acting as advocates of the rights of third parties who seek access to their market or function.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[0]ur decisions have settled that limitations on a litigant's assertion of jus tertii are not constitutionally mandated, but rather stem from a salutary "rule of self-restraint” designed to minimize unwarranted intervention into controversies where the applicable constitutional questions are ill-defined and speculative.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.