Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1989
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 43 Ala. App. 287 - Miller v. State · 40 Ala. App. 344 - Earnest v. State · Porter v. State · Porter v. State · 27 Ala. App. 78 - Roper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We have had no case called to our attention which would establish a rule of cumulative prejudice because more than one superfluous written charge — even though flawless as to law or rule of evidence — has been refused in the context of substantially correct delivered directions of law considered in their entirety, written or oral or both. Such a rule would elevate technicality above common sense and fairness to society." Reed v. State , 43 Ala. App. 419 , 423 , 191 So.2d 258 (1966).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.