43 ALAAPP 60 - Berry v. State

CATES, Judge.

¶1This cause was submitted September 9, 1965.

¶2Berry appeals from a judgment on a general verdict of guilt.

¶3The Court adjudicated him guilty of grand larceny (a charge found in count 2 of the indictment) 1 2and sentenced him to four years in the penitentiary.

¶4When the State rested, defense counsel moved to exclude the evidence because, under Code 1940, T. 15, § 307,2 there was no corroboration to the required degree of the testimony of witnesses, who, if at all connected in the crime with the defendant, were self admitted accomplices.

¶5We have carefully reviewed the evidence adduced by the State. Since there is but a vacuum of negative proportions, a recital of facts would serve no purpose.

¶6We conclude the motion to exclude should have been granted. Lindsey v. State, 170 Ala. 80, 54 So. 516; Sorrell v. State, 249 Ala. 292, 31 So.2d 82; King v. State, 23 Ala.App. 55, 120 So. 466; Fitts v. State, 24 Ala.App. 405, 135 So. 654; Parish v. State, 28 Ala.App. 81, 179 So. 387; and Brown v. State, 31 Ala.App. 529, 19 So.2d 88.

¶7The judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded for hew trial.

¶8Reversed and remanded.

¶9. Tbe other court was for burglary in tbe second degree.

¶10. “§ 307. A conviction of felony cannot be bad on tbe testimony of an accomplice, unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect tbe defendant with tbe commission of tbe offense; and such corroborative evidence, if it merely shows tbe commission of the offense or tbe circumstances thereof, is not suffieent.”