Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 ARKAPP 190 - Hudson v. State

Hudson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williford v. State · Girdner v. City of Kensett · 38 Ark. App. 18 - Brown v. State · King v. State · Fiegel v. City of Cabot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(e) The person tested may have a physician or a qualified technician, registered nurse, or other qualified person of his own choice administer a complete chemical test in addition to any test administered at the direction of a law enforcement officer. (1) The law enforcement officer shall advise the person of this right. (2) The refusal or failure of a law enforcement officer to advise such person of this right and to permit and assist the person to obtain such test shall preclude the admission of evidence relating to the test taken at the direction of a law enforcement officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.