Shore v. Shore’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably 45 Cal. 2d 872 - Sefton v. Sefton (1955), 110 Cal. App. 3d 787 - McKinney v. County of Santa Clara (1980)
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 20 Cal. 2d 839 - Stark v. Coker · Vallera v. Vallera · 16 Cal. 2d 169 - Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n · 14 Cal. 2d 47 - Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co. · 28 Cal. 2d 147 - Olwell v. W. L. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is settled, however, that a judgment in a prior action between the same parties on the identical cause of action is res judicata, and a bar to a second suit thereon, not only as to issues actually determined therein but also as to issues necessarily involved. (Citations.) And even though the cause of action be different, the prior determination of an issue is conclusive in a subsequent suit between the same parties-as to that issue and every matter which might have been urged to sustain or defeat its determination. (Citations.) ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““When the property rights of the parties are properly put in issue by the pleadings in an annulment action, the court may determine them. (Citations.) If the purported marriage was not entered into in good faith, however, the court may not properly award the property of the parties as if the marriage had been valid and the property community in character. (Citations.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.