Laubisch v. Roberdo’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 8 Cal. 4th 333 - California School Employees Ass'n. v. Governing Board of the Marine Community College District (1994), Mandel v. Hodges (1976)
3 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Archer v. City of Los Angeles · Sichler v. Look · 29 Cal. 2d 414 - West v. Evans · 21 Cal. 2d 354 - Butcher v. Brouwer · City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the purpose of [the provision] was to give to persons required by law to perform an act within a certain period an extension of time equal to the number of intervening holidays which deprived them of access to public offices or institutions for the transaction of business. 5”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The quoted sections of the Code of Civil Procedure are applicable to proceedings in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1201.1; Withington v. Shay, 47 Cal.App.2d 68, 73 [ 117 P.2d 415 , 119 P.2d 1 ].) Such a lien is in the nature of a mortgage and an action for its foreclosure resembles a proceeding to foreclose a mortgage; the same procedural and substantive principles are generally appropriate in both eases. (Curnow v. Happy Valley Blue Gravel & Hydraulic Co., 68 Cal. 262, 264 [ 9 P. 149 ]; Ritter v. Stevenson, 7 Cal. 388, 389 ; Withington v. Shay, supra, p. 73 .) ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The only process provided for the enforcement of a judgment foreclosing a lien upon specific property is that prescribed by section 684 of the Code of Civil Procedure, requiring a judgment for the sale of property to be enforced by a ‘writ’ reciting the judgment and directing the sale. Such ‘writ’ is not an 1 execution’ within the meaning of section 683, and a sale of the property by the sheriff is not invalidated because made after the return day of the writ.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.