Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Cal. 3d 501 - In Re Jackson

43 Cal. 3d 501 - In Re Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2008 · most notably San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Rusell S. (1990), 94 Cal. App. 4th 1048 - Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego Section (2001)

41 state decisions

290198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Hewitt v. Helms · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · Olim v. Wakinekona · Baxter v. Palmigiano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`(1) the private interest that will be affected by the official action, (2) the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards, (3) the [dignity] interest in informing individuals of the nature, grounds and consequences of the action and in enabling them to present their side of the story before a responsible governmental official, and (4) the governmental interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “contain[s] information (confidential or otherwise) from which a reviewing court can conclude the hearing officer actually made a reliability and truthfulness determination, and that the determination is supported by evidence. [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.