Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Cal. 3d 584 - People v. Hendricks

43 Cal. 3d 584 - People v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

164
cited by 164 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 157 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 164 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 9 Cal. 4th 83 - People v. Crittenden (1994), 53 Cal. 3d 618 - People v. Cox (1991)

1 federal appellate · 157 state decisions

7301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Zant v. Stephens · Brookhart v. Janis · California v. Ramos · Payne v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 164 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “applies only when the defendant agrees to a submission procedure, such as a guilty plea or a submission on the preliminary hearing transcript, by virtue of which he surrenders one or more of the three specified rights. Second, there is no such surrender when the defendant undergoes - and thereby exercises his right to - a jury trial and has the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses against him and to refuse to incriminate himself.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'is to "assure that the record demonstrably discloses the defendant knows of and voluntarily waives the three specified rights ... surrendered by a guilty plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “There was no dispute as to the identity of the person[s] killed — evidently the only issue on which the photograph[s were] relevant — and therefore the photograph[s] should have been excluded because [they] bore on no contested issue. [Citation.] The error, however, must be deemed harmless. `As we have seen, from the evidence presented at the guilt phase this was not a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.