Johnston v. Ota’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 1970 · most notably Flores v. Arroyo (1961), 34 Cal. 2d 209 - Dillard v. McKnight (1949)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Russell v. Place · People v. Newell · Sewell v. Price · Campanella v. Campanella · Glaze v. Bogle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The only exception to the rule is where unreasonable hardship would result. ( Bank of America v. Button, supra . ) Although the judgment pleaded was an adjudication of the matter at bar and may have been rendered by the same court upon the same cause of action, and although such judgment and its supporting papers may be on file in the same court still the party pleading such prior adjudication carried the burden of establishing his plea which can be done only by actual proof of its records. ( Glaze v. Bogle, supra [ 105 Ga. 295 ( 31 S.E. 169 )].) "It must appear either upon the face of the record or be shown by extrinsic evidence that the precise issue raised in the second action was determined in the former suit.... "There was no circumstance in the instant case that would have justified the court's taking judicial notice of the judgment pleaded or of the pleadings which preceded it....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weil v. Barthel“It must appear either upon the face of the record or be shown by extrinsic evidence that the precise issue raised in the second action was determined in the former suit....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weil v. Barthel“the court will not take judicial notice of other actions, not even those pending or concluded in the same court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wolfsen v. Hathaway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.