Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 CALAPP3D 253 - People v. Eitzen

People v. Eitzen’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
3
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably 21 Cal. 4th 737 - People v. Frazer (1999), People v. Gordon (1985)

34 state decisions

2201974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 60 Cal. 2d 631 - People v. Morse · 47 Cal. 2d 374 - People v. Roberts · Calvin R. Morgan v. Riverside Mills Company, C. A. Folk, T. I. Ward · 1 Cal. 3d 144 - Skelton v. Superior Court · 9 Cal. 3d 662 - People v. Uhlemann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But a magistrate conducting a preliminary examination must be convinced of only such a state of facts as would lead a man of ordinary caution or prudence to believe, and conscientiously entertain a strong suspicion of the guilt of the accused. [Citations.] In other words, `Evidence that will justify a prosecution need not be sufficient to support a conviction.... An information will not be set aside or a prosecution thereon prohibited if there is some rational ground for assuming the possibility that an offense has been committed and the accused is guilty of it. [Citations.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that is, such a state of facts as would lead a person of ordinary caution or prudence to believe and consciously entertain a strong suspicion of the guilt of the accused. ( Williams v. Superior Court (1969) 71 Cal.2d 1144, 1147 [ 80 Cal. Rptr. 747 , 81 Cal. Rptr. 761 , 458 P.2d 987 ]; Dudley v. Superior Court, supra, 36 Cal. App.3d 977, 982 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “intended to allow the district attorney to ignore the magistrate's findings of fact and charge the defendant with an offense or offenses which the magistrate has expressly found never took place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.