Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 CONNAPP 801 - State v. Ingram

State v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Radzvilowicz (1997), State v. Ingram (1997)

66 state decisions

3201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · State v. Golding · Missouri v. Hunter · Albernaz v. United States · White v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] statute does not become ambiguous solely because the parties disagree as to its meaning.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.