Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 CUSTCT 133 - James v. United States

James v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 1961
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States · Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, * * *, wholly or in chief value of metal, and not specially provided for * « * $ # * * Other * * *_13%% ad val.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “DESCRIPTION AND USES. — Sugar-mill machinery includes rolls for crushing cane and extracting the juice, filter presses, tanks, coils, and evaporators, and centrifugal machines for separating the molasses from sugar. In beet-sugar manufacture the crushers used in cane-sugar production are replaced by washers, slicers, and tanks for extracting the sugar with hot water.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.