Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 F.1d 556 - In re Rahrer

In re Rahrer’s Empirical Analysis

43 F. 556 · 1890

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1891
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Leisy v. Hardin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person or persons who shall manufacture, sell or barter any spirituous, malt, vinous, fermented or other intoxicat ing liquors, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and punished as hereinafter provided: Provided, however, That such liquors may be sold for medical, scientific and mechanical purposes; as provided in this act. “ It- shall, be unlawful for any person :or persons to sell or barter for medical, scientific or mechanical purposes, any malt, vinous, spirituous, fermented or other intoxicating liquors, without first having procured a druggist permit therefor from the probate judge of the county wherein such druggist may be doing business at the time,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “That all fermented, .distilled or other intoxicating liquors or liquids transported into any State or Territory or remaining therein for use, consumption, sale or storage' therein, shall upon arrival in such- State or Territory be subject to the operation and effect of the laws of such State or Territory enacted in the exercise of its, police powers, to the same extent and in the same manner as though such liquids or liquors had been produced in such State or Territory, and shall not be exempt therefrom by reason of being introduced therein in original packages or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.