Harmon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
43 F. 560 · 1890
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1926
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Jones · McElrath v. United States · United States v. Johnston · O'Brien v. Wheelock · United States v. The Bank of the Metropolis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This allowance is not expressly, or by any reasonable implication, restricted to a single travel at each term, but extends to every time when he may be expected to travel from bis home to attend a term of court, if the court sits for any number of days in succession, he should continue in attendance, and is entitled to only one travel. But, if the court is adjourned over one or more intervening days, lie is not obliged to remain at his own expense at ihe place of holding- courr, but may return to his home, and charge travel for going anew to attend the term at the day to -which it is adjourned.” Harmon v. U. S., 43 Fed. 560 565. affirmed 147 U. S. 268 -279, 13 Sup. Ct. 327 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to the place, of service which is most remote, adding thereto the extra travel, ■which is necessary to serve it on the others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where more than one person is served therewith,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.