Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 F.1d 894 - Westinghouse v. Carpenter

Westinghouse v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis

43 F. 894 · 1888

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 1927
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1927

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2018881890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are of tbe opinion that with the expiration of his patent the plaintiff’s right to forbid anybody to make, sell, or use the articles to which this invention refers expires.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.