Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 F.2d 507 - Carr v. Wainwright

Carr v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

43 F.2d 507 · 1930

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gruber v. Klein · Morris County Brick Co. v. Austin · McDonald v. Luckenbach · McGhee Investment Co. v. Kirsher · First National Bank v. Dorvall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An accommodation party is one who has signed the instrument as maker, drawer, acceptor or indorser, without receiving value therefor, and for the purpose of lending his name to some other person; such person is liable on the instrument to a holder for value, notwithstanding such holder at the time of taking the instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party.” R. S. 7:2-29.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.