Heaton v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
43 F.3d 1176 · 1994
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on Longview Fibre Co. v. Rasmussen · The Raleigh and Gaston Railroad Co v. Reid Sheriff · Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hamburg Shirt Corporation, a Corporation · Clark v. Groose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`when a statute limits a thing to be done in a particular mode, it includes a negative of any other mode'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“maxim of statutory construction inclusio unius est exclusio alterius”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In our view, section 207(o)(5) clearly allocates the relative rights of employees and employers to control the use of accrued compensatory time. An employee has the right to use the accrued time as the employee sees fit subject only to the employer’s limited right to deny an employee’s request if it would unduly disrupt the employer’s operations. Congress has not provided the employer with any further right to unilaterally control or to force the employee’s use of compensatory time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.