Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 F.3d 1261 - Casey v. Lewis

Casey v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

43 F.3d 1261 · 1994

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017 · most notably Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey (1996), Dilley v. Gunn (1995)

19 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

340199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Wolff v. McDonnell · Bounds v. Smith · Procunier v. Martinez · Hutto v. Finney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ADOC prisoners in all . . . custody levels shall be provided regular and comparable visits to the law library.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] prisoner cannot adequately use the law library under restraint, including handcuffs and shackles,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[p]articular steps must be taken to locate and train bilingual prisoners to be Legal Assistants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.