Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

43 F.3d 1467

Docket No. 93-7208.

Longenette v. Abercrombie

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: November 15, 1994 Decided: December 19, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-12-19

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Leonard J. Lankas v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Buffalo Mining Company

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-12-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2013

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CA-92-123-E)

William D. Longenette, Appellant Pro Se. M. Suzanne McCartney, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, Todd F. LaNeve, Bachmann, Hess, Bachmann & Garden, Wheeling, WA, for Appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Longenette v. Abercrombie, No. CA-92-123-E (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/43/f3d/1467 · .json · Public domain