Coxson Coxson v. Commonwealth Mortgage Company of America Lp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(e) Jurisdiction of courts; limitations on actions; State attorney general enforcement Any action under this section may be brought in any United States district court, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation. This subsection does not bar a person from asserting a violation of this subchapter in an action to collect the debt which was brought more than one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation as a matter of defense by recoupment or set-off in such action, except as otherwise provided by State law. [2] (emphasis added)”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Dawson v. Thomas (In Re Dawson) · Wentz v. Saxon Mortgage (In Re Wentz)

2. “... we are guided by the general rule that the court should give the contract a construction that the parties intended that the unearned interest would not be retained ...”); Bemie’s Custom Coach of Texas, Inc. v. Small Business Administration, 987 F.2d 1195, 1199 (5th Cir.1993) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Mims v. Fidelity Funding, Inc. (In Re Auto International Refrigeration)

3. “within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Sallings