Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 F.3d 299 - United States v. Dillard

United States v. Dillard’s Empirical Analysis

43 F.3d 299 · 1994

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
January 2014
most recently cited

63 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably United States v. Ross (1996), United States v. Johnson-Dix (1995)

63 federal appellate ·

600199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Santobello v. New York · United States v. Dunnigan · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] district court's Rule 403 balancing is afforded a special degree of deference: [o]nly in an extreme case are appellate judges competent to second-guess the judgment of the person on the spot, the trial judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “tenure in the conspiracy may have been relatively short”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if a defendant objects to a sentence enhancement resulting from [his] trial testimony, [the] district court must review the evidence and make independent findings necessary to establish a willful impediment to or obstruction of justice, or an attempt to do the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.