SEC v. Mark Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 4 · 13 U.S.C. § 4 · 14 U.S.C. § 4 · 15 U.S.C. § 4 (§ 4 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 77T (§ 20 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 16 U.S.C. § 4 · 18 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on United States v. Davis · Gabelli v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Liu v. Sec · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Kimberlynn Creek Ranch, Inc. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pentagon Capital Management PLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one [defendant] was a mere passive recipient of profits,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“partners engaged in concerted wrongdoing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.