43 F. App'x 244 - Woodruff v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Haines v. Kerner · Heck v. Humphrey · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]ection 1983 actions are typically the proper vehicle for attacking unconstitutional conditions of confinement and parole procedures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dotson v. Wilkinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.