Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 FAPPX 946 - Rumler v. Hemingway

Rumler v. Hemingway’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Reyes-Requena v. United States · In Re Ocsulis Dorsainvil · Triestman v. United States · Charles v. Chandler

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.