Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 FLA 561 - Schang v. State

Schang v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
December 1986
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1986

13 state decisions

40190119101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Roosnell · Davis v. State · Murphy v. State · People v. McDonald · State v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever ravishes and carnally knows a female of the age of ten years or more, by force and against her will, or unlawfully or carnally knows and abuses a female child under the age of ten years * (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In such cases the law presumes that a child of such immature age is incapable of either consenting to or protesting against the act * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.