Technograph, Inc. v. Texas Instruments Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2004
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · Schlagenhauf v. Holder · Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. · 89 F. Supp. 357 - United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation · The Guilford National Bank of Greensboro, Administrator C.T.A., D.B.N., of the Estate of Joseph M. Coble, Deceased v. Southern Railway Company, and Third-Party v. Garland Batchelor, of the Estate of Annie J. Coble, Deceased, Third-Party
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In general, discovery before trial as to damages is proper”). It makes no sense to bifurcate the proceedings for discovery purposes unless the court is going to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.