43 F. Supp. 339 - Fleming v. Sondock’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1953
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jax Beer Co. v. Redfern · Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall · Fleming v. Arsenal Bldg. Corp. · White Motor Co. v. Littleton · Swift & Co. v. Wilkerson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where it appeared that employers were engaged solely in furnishing to public for a consideration detectives and watchmen, that watchmen were furnished to approximately 294 clients, all of whom resided in Texas, that approximately 59 of the clients were industrial concerns most of whom were engaged in part in interstate but mainly in intrastate commerce, and that watchmen made visits at night when the clients' businesses were not open except at three places, the employers operated a `service establishment' and the greater part of the service was made in `intrastate commerce' within Fair Labor Standards Act exemption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.