Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 FSUPP 744 - Newcomb v. Young

Newcomb v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1960
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1960

30194219501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fred Fisher, Inc. v. Dillingham · Harold Lloyd Corp. v. Witwer · Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Majestic Pictures Corp. · Lewys v. O'Neill · Wilkie v. Santly Bros.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The similarity of sentiment, thought and treatment of each of the two songs here in issue is only natural and does not spell copying and/or infringement. Apropos of this, Judge Woolsey, in Lewys v. O’Neill, D.C., 49 F.2d 603 , at page 606, quoted Dr. Samuel Johnson (October 2, 1753) on this subject: '* * * A coincidence of sentiment may easily happen without any communication, since there are many occasions in which all reasonable men will nearly think alike. Writers of all ages have had the same sentiments, because they have in all ages had the same objects of speculation; the interests and passions, the virtues and vices of mankind, have been diversified in different times; only by unessential and casual varieties; and we must, therefore, expect in the words of all those who attempt to describe them, such a likeness as we find in the pictures of the same person drawn in different periods of his life.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.