43 F. Supp. 2d 1102 - Davis v. Leal’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Relies on United States 77-1359 v. Kimbell Foods Inc · Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc. · Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc. · 47 Cal. 3d 654 - Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. · O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“normally, when courts decide to fashion rules of federal common law, the guiding principle is that a significant conflict between some federal policy or interest and the use of state law must first be specifically shown”) (internal quotation omitted). Here, there is no alleged conflict between state law and federal policy. . The Court acknowledges that the United States alleges that the ZBA exceeded its authority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.