43 F. Supp. 2d 1130 - Alwaday v. Beebe’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2013
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on McCarthy v. Madigan · Richardson v. Reno · Magana-Pizano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8405, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,671 Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · 28 F. Supp. 2d 1275 - Martinez v. Greene
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“released” from state custody upon the trial judge's suspension of his prison term, see Resp. to Pet. For a Writ of Habeas Corpus at 12 n. 11, the question of the temporal reach of section 236(c)(1), namely, whether its requirement of mandatory detention applies to an alien who has been released before being taken into immigration custody, is still before the Court. 5 . Congress enacted the IIRIRA, Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, on September 30, 1996. The act included”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The Attorney General shall take into custody any alien who [commits an enumerated felony] when the alien is released, without regard to whether the alien is released on parole, supervised release, or probation, and without regard to whether the alien may be arrested or imprisoned again for the same offense, (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Attorney General’s discretionary judgment regarding the application of this section shall not be subject to review. No court may set aside any action or decision by the Attorney General under this section regarding the detention or release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.