43 F. Supp. 2d 39 - Christopher v. Billington’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Haines v. Kerner · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“entirely inadequate” in the absence of contextual information showing whether qualified women applied for positions). 7 . The current record does not disclose the substance of the EEOC's decision. 8 . On March 31, 2000 the court issued an Order consistent with the terms of the instant Memorandum Opinion, resolving the defendant’s outstanding motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the defendant filed its answer to the complaint on April 14, 2000, and the plaintiff filed a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.