Wheeler v. Gallet’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1991
1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mills v. Porter · State ex rel. Jamison v. Forsyth · Stong v. People ex rel. Curran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A separate article or entry in an account or schedule; a sum entered.” A new English Dictionary, edited by James A. H. Murray, L.L.D. defines it as: “An article or unit of any kind included in an enumeration, computation, or sum total; an entry or thing entered in an account or register, a clause of a document, a detail of expenditure or income, etc.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cenarrusa v. Andrus““The Governor shall have the power to disapprove of any item or items of any bill making appropriations of money embracing distinct items, and the part or parts approved shall become a law and the item or items disapproved shall be void unless enacted in the manner following.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.