Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Idaho 625 - Walker v. Hyde

Walker v. Hyde’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 1999 · most notably Watson v. Grimm (1952), Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co. (1929)

26 state decisions

7019271930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cudahy Packing Co of Nebraska v. Parramore · Erie Railroad v. Winfield · Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated Railroad · Hills v. Blair · Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the weight of authority, the rule would seem to be that the injury must have been sustained or death caused due to some act or condition connected with the doing of the work, or that the injury must have been sustained or death caused at or near the place at which the injured party was required to work by the terms of his employment, and in the doing of the things for which he was employed. The employment of the deceased was to cut down trees and saw them into logs. His place of employment was approximately one-half mile from where he was injured. The accident occurred during the noon hour, at which time deceased had left his place of employment and his employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.