¶1ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
¶2This cause coming to be heard on the motion of the Respondent to dismiss and the Court being fully advised in the premises,
¶3Finds that the Claimant was working on a highway construction project when he was injured. The Claimant’s employer, a private contractor, has paid over $100,000.00 in workers’ compensation payments to the Claimant. The Respondent has moved that this claim be dismissed as the Claimant has received over $100,000.00 “from other sources for the same incident.”
¶4This Court, in Sallee v. State (1990), 42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 41, has held that the collateral source rule applies in the Court of Claims as in the Circuit Courts. In Paschal v. State (1991), 43 Ill. Ct. Cl. 229, this Court held that monies received from workers’ compensation are not to be “set-off” and that an injured person, who is not a State employee, may maintain an action for his injuries in this Court even if that person has received over $100,000.00 in workers’ compensation from his employer.
¶5The Paschal decision was filed in 1991, and the opinion appears in this volume at page 229, supra.
¶6It is hereby ordered that the Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied.
¶7ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
¶8This cause coming to be heard on the motion of the Respondent, State of Illinois, to dismiss, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;
¶9It is hereby ordered that the Claimant’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties agreeing that the action has been fully settled, compromised, and adjourned.