Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 IND 132 - Oliver v. Pate

Oliver v. Pate’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2012 · most notably Vogel v. Gruaz (1884), Filarsky v. Delia (2012)

38 state decisions — followed in 11 states

90187318801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whiting v. . Barney · Parker v. Carter · Newell v. Downs · Wilkinson v. Arnold · Ammerman v. Crosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Public policy requires that a person in making communications to a prosecuting attorney, relative to criminals or persons suspected of being guilty of crime, should be at liberty to make a full statement to him without fear of disclosure.” (Page 141.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.