Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 INDAPP 519 - Price v. Walker

Price v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2005

14 state decisions

9019091910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 2 E.H. Smith 9 - Marshall v. . Sherman · Milliken v. Pratt · Pope v. Hanke · Seamans v. Temple Co. · Edwards v. Estell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an action for commissions against the owner of real estate sold, a substantial compliance with the terms of the statute will be required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “so that there may be no doubt of the existence of the contract, or dispute as to its provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.