Simpson v. Kirschbaum & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1890
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1936
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The denial of a motion to dismiss an action made' by the defendant) is not one of the orders of the district court from which error lies to this court until the final disposition of the action.” (See, also, Dolbee v. Hoover, 8 Kan. 124.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The denial of a motion, to dismiss an action made by the defendant, is not one of the orders of the district court from which error lies to the supreme court until the final disposition of the action in the court below.” (Syl.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.