Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 KAN 590 - Wilkinson v. Elliott

Wilkinson v. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
10
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2003 · most notably Norris v. Cross, Secretary of State (1909), Rumsey v. Rumsey (1939)

25 state decisions — followed in 10 states

90189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vanzant v. Vanzant · Maddox v. Humphries · Brightman v. Brightman · Daniel v. . Hodges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the petition has been filed, the action is pending, so as to charge third persons with notice of its pendency, and while pending no interest can be acquired by third persons in the subject-matter thereof as against the plaintiff’s title,” etc.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.