43 Kan. App. 2d 842 - State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Franks v. Delaware · State v. Ivory · State v. Nunn · State v. Bryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When a Defendant is in nonexclusive possession of the premises upon which a controlled substance is found, it cannot be inferred that the Defendant knowingly possessed the controlled substance unless there are other circumstances linking the Defendant to the controlled substance. Factors you may consider in determining whether the Defendant knowingly possessed the controlled substance include: 1. Defendant’s use of controlled substances . . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.