Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 LAANN 488 - Robbins v. Martin

Robbins v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1957
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1957

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

501891190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The action for supplement of the price on the part of the seller, and that for diminution of the price or for the canceling of the contract on the part of the buyer, must be brought within one year from the day of the contract, otherwise it is barred.” ,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.