43 Md. App. 229 - Ginn v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Joseph H. Munson Co. v. Secretary of State (1984), 134 Ill. App. 3d 543 - Janiczek v. Dover Management Co. (1985)
2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. · Bryniarski v. Montgomery County Board of Appeals · Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of Assessments · DuBay v. Crane · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It might be argued that we should dismiss the appeal as to all appellants because the brief was written in their behalf by Ms. Ginn. We know of no rule or procedure that requires such action, nor shall we impose it....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f, as Alexander Pope wrote, `a little learning is a dangerous thing,' then a little learning in the law is particularly perilous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.