43 Md. App. 259 - State v. Hiken’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Houltin v. United States · Texas v. Louisiana · State v. Hicks · Epps v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the State was, or certainly should have been, ready for trial within a very short time after the indictments. . . .” Id. at 272 . The present case, involving a drug-related murder, would probably appear on the spectrum of complexity somewhere between Schmitt and Hiken . Nevertheless, we think that, under the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.