Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 MICH 465 - Smith v. Hobart

Smith v. Hobart’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1914
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Was it valid? We have no doubt about it. The case is beyond the aid of the liberality extended to pleadings before magistrates. The declaration not only lacks matter of substance, but is wholly vague and uncertain. No one can gather from it any clear notion of the essential characteristics of the complaint intended to be asserted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The plaintiff declares in assumpsit specially for damages for breach of warranty on a pair of horses purchased of defendant, and claims damages of $200.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.