Bunce v. Beck’s Empirical Analysis
1869
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 1928 · most notably Black River Lumber Co. v. Warner (1887), Dougherty v. Dougherty (1907)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moss v. Green · Rollins v. Claybrook · Brewster v. Countryman · Matthews v. Coalter · Bailey v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is a general rule that extrinsic evidence cannot be admitted to contradict, add to, subtract from, or vary a written instrument.” 2 Phil. Ev. (Edw. Ed.) 637.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Shafer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.