Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 N.J. 369 - State v. Van Duyne

State v. Van Duyne’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2007 · most notably Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966), Gentile v. State Bar of Nev. (1991)

63 state decisions — followed in 10 states

28019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Rideau v. Louisiana · Craig v. Harney · New York v. United States · State v. Kociolek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “analyze and evaluate carefully the words, attitude and demeanor of the juror when he asserts an impartial mind and one which is free from prejudice regardless of the improper newspaper publicity. If, in spite of the disavowal, the trial court has any lingering doubt about the juror’s capacity for impartiality, he should be excused from service. [Id. at 386].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “determine for itself whether the pretrial newspaper stories are so pervasive and so prejudicial, or the juror’s protestation of unaffected impartiality after reading them so unconvincing or doubtful that a new trial should be ordered. [Ibid.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(T)he succession of blows, the patently vicious manner of their infliction, the enormity of the cruelty and the horrendous injuries suffered provide further evidence of a wilful execution of an intent to kill. 204 A.2d at 846”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.