Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 NY 424 - Chamberlain v. . Chamberlain

Chamberlain v. . Chamberlain’s Empirical Analysis

1871

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
March 1987
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 146 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1987 · most notably Trustees of Amherst College v. Ritch (1897), Hutchison v. Ross (1933)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 146 state decisions — followed in 15 states

490187118801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the residuary bequests are valid, there was an equitable conversion of the whole estate into personalty for all the purposes of the will. The gifts were of money, the avails of the real and personal estate, and the conversion of the realty into personalty, under the authority conferred upon the executors, is regarded as having been accomplished at the death of the testator. Leigh & D. Conv. 5, 109; Phelps v. Pond, 23 N. Y. 69 ; Thornton v. Hawley, 10 Ves. 129; Stagg v. Jackson, 1 N. Y. 206 . If, therefore, the disposition of the residue of the estate in favor of the two corporations named as legatees is valid as a bequest of personal property, and to the extent that the two corporations can take under the will, regarding the gift as of personalty, and not of realty, the will must stand. The Centenary Fund Society is a foreign corporation, having its existence under the laws of Pennsylvania, and located within that state. The existence, however, of corporations organized under the laws of a sister state, is recognized by the courts of this state; and they may take property here under wills executed by citizens of the state if, by the law of their creation, they have authority to acquire property by devise or bequest.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.