43 Ohio App. 3d 184 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2015
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · State v. Delaney · 7 Ohio App. 3d 262 - State v. Wallace · In re Williamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Moses and Wallace found that once a capias is issued the period is tolled. There is ?io authority for that conclusion other than the policy that jurisdiction should be retained. If a public policy exception can be grafted onto the statutes then it should require that jurisdiction be retained only if appellant hid himself and eluded the capias within the county and the capias was journalized before the probation period ended.” (Emphasis sic.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * This court has held that the issuance of a journalized capias was tantamount to a journal entry declaring defendant an absconder. State v. Moses (Nov. 29,1984), Cuyahoga App. No. 47835, unreported, at 1, 3 [ 1984 WL 6217 ] (capias issued, Journal Entry, July 14, 1983).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““First, Wallace and Moses were wrongly decided. R.C. 2951.07 states that the period is tolled if ‘the probationer absconds or otherwise absents himself from the jurisdiction of the court * * *.’ (Emphasis added.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.