Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 OHIOST3D 181 - State v. Yackley

State v. Yackley’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 64 Ohio App. 2d 141 - State v. Thomas · 13 Ohio App. 3d 456 - State v. Petrou · 19 Ohio App. 3d 214 - State v. Weber · 3 Ohio App. 3d 468 - City of Chillicothe v. Herron · In Re Brady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as: [A]nyone who has been convicted of an offense in this state or any other jurisdiction and who previously or subsequently has not been convicted of the same or a different offense in this state or any other jurisdiction. R.C. 2953.31 (A) also mandates that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[p]rior to 1984, R.C. 2953.31 defined the `first offender' as `anyone who had not been convicted of any offense, which must be construed to include traffic violations and drunk driving.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The 1984 amendment specifically includes violations of R.C. 4511.19 in the category of offenses which act as a bar to expungement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.