Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 OHIOST3D 607 - In re Trent

In re Trent’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re M.D. · 44 Cal. 3d 283 - Michael G. v. Superior Court · In Re Ronald S. · 110 Wis. 2d 168 - Interest of D.L.D. v. Circuit Court for Crawford County · 30 Ohio App. 3d 83 - In Re Kriak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(3) less restrictive alternatives must be considered and found to be ineffective; and *Page 18 {¶ 57}”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.