Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Okla. 213 - Cress v. Estes

Cress v. Estes’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2024

5 state decisions

20191419201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is within the power of the courts to determine what the law is, after it has been enacted . . . but the courts are without power to say what law shall or shall not be enacted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “say what law shall or shall not be enacted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.